There was a rise in stress levels, depressive symptoms, and anxiety in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was something not just limited to the risk of getting infected but also post-infection mental health consequences, ranging from moderate to severe anxiety and depressive symptoms that could last even 30 months post-exposure to SARS-CoV2 (Hummel et al., 2021). Medical professionals experienced a higher burden while working at a faster pace, having less time to process trauma, and they were also prone to developing post-traumatic stress symptoms and post-traumatic stress disorder (Riedel et al., 2021). Moreover, healthcare professionals were affected by external factors such as institutional limited capacities, being surrounded by quarantined individuals, disrupted social support during isolation, and lack of personal protective equipment, all creating distress among frontline health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic (Sultana et al., 2020). In addition, while this was identified, there were other healthcare professionals developing techniques or taking advantage of the digital era to treat and prevent mental illnesses in medical professionals. Such is the case for online psychological assistance services that were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic (Dincer and Inangil, 2021).
This Research Topic collects four research articles that describe different geographic populations of frontline healthcare professionals during the pandemic, and the psychosocial effects of taking care of patients, working with blurry guidelines, extensive working hours, and the protective factors that prevent developing burnout, depression, and anxiety symptomatology.
Maghsoodi et al. conducted a qualitative study on nurses, with the goal of determining their perceptions of work and life during the COVID-19 pandemic. They took an approach using interviews, which provided different and individualized perspectives of the matter. However, their results converged into similar concerns, such as team cooperation and communication challenges in difficult work conditions, or suffering and dissatisfaction with unfair wages and benefits. The authors divided the findings into main themes that were classified as an unsafe work environment and the shadow of suffering and death. This study contributed to showing the perspectives and sufferings of healthcare professionals that have most contact with the patient, and the psychological, professional, and social toll the pandemic had on them. On the other hand, in Italian physicians and nurses, Epifanio et al. explored the existence of a positive correlation between hopelessness and burnout, and the role of Trait Emotional Intelligence in this relationship. They concluded that there were significant burnout level differences in genders, professional profiles, and working zones, but also that Trait Emotional Intelligence presented a protective role on healthcare workers’ mental health. In a similar vein Hu et al. conducted a study in China and analyzed the different psychological states of medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide a reference for the formulation of a psychological crisis intervention plan. Their results showed that female workers were more prone to the negative effects of depression and hypochondriac emotional stress. However, doctors and nurses were all affected by depression, neurasthenia, obsessive anxiety, and stress. Based on these results, they recommended having psychological counseling for their front-line staff and to improve their emergency management practices. Another study in China was conducted by Yin et al. evaluating the effects of long working hours and depressive symptoms present in medical staff. They concluded that most medical professionals that worked more than 8 h per day presented depressive symptoms. Factors like family support or organizational support showed relevance when mitigating burnout and depressive symptoms among medical professionals in this study. These findings can help to develop structures that allow medical professionals to have a better work-life balance and to avoid the deleterious effects of being overworked, especially in situations like the COVID-19 pandemic.
In view of the findings of this Research Topic, identifying the risk and protective factors of mental health issues among physicians and nurses should be a priority in emergencies situations, not forgetting that they are humans and the role they play in high stress and high responsibility situations might have a deleterious psychosocial effect on them. Psychological support structures should be developed to identify, treat, and prevent further psychological damage in front-line healthcare providers in situations of emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Author contributions
CM-M: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank all the contributing authors for their engagement with the Research Topic and all the Frontiers staff for their support to the Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Dincer, B., and Inangil, D. (2021). The effect of emotional freedom techniques on nurses’ stress, anxiety, and burnout levels during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial. Explore 17, 109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.11.012
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Hummel, S., Oetjen, N., Du, J., Posenato, E., de Resende Almeida, R. M., Losada, R., et al. (2021). Mental health among medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in eight european countries: cross-sectional survey study. J. Med. Int. Res. 23, e24983. doi: 10.2196/24983
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Riedel, B., Horen, S. R., Reynolds, A., and Hamidian Jahromi, A. (2021). Mental health disorders in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: implications and coping strategies. Front. Pub. Health 9, 707358. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.707358
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Sultana, A., Sharma, R., Hossain, M. M., Bhattacharya, S., and Purohit, N. (2020). Burnout among healthcare providers during COVID-19: challenges and evidence-based interventions. Indian J. Med. Ethics V, 1–6. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.73
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Keywords: COVID-19, burnout, depression, anxiety, physicians, nurses
Citation: MartÃnez-MartÃnez CA (2024) Editorial: Burnout syndrome and PTSD in physicians and their relation after COVID-19. Front. Psychol. 15:1358020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358020
Received: 19 December 2023; Accepted: 09 January 2024;Published: 22 January 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Changiz Mohiyeddini, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, United States
Copyright © 2024 MartÃnez-MartÃnez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Carlos AnÃbal MartÃnez-MartÃnez, anibal.martinez@unah.edu.hn
